Sign In

Rare Case Map Example of Colton's Finest Large Format Map of the United States

Colton’s 1854 large-format map of the United States is not just  a visual masterpiece in cartography, it encapsulates the massive strides that the nation had achieved in only a few generations.  

This monumental four-sheet wall map of the United States was produced at a  time when the country was still taking shape and the violent throngs of Civil  War had not yet engulfed the nation.  

The map was produced in multiple editions, all of which were issued in the same important year (1854). More often found varnished on rollers as a wall map, this example has been segmented and laid on linen, making for an unusually fresh example of the map.

This is the  rare third edition of the  map, in which Kansas is named for the first time. Both Kansas and Nebraska  formally became U.S. Territories on May 30th 1854, when President Franklin Pierce signed the Kansas-Nebraska Act into law. This development was pushed through in part due to feverish ambitions of constructing a Transcontinental Railroad through this region, and presumably occurred at roughly the same time that the first edition of this map was issued. Consequently, Kansas remained undefined in the first state of this map.  

Kansas was subsequently delineated but not named in the map’s second state, and would only be honored with a territorial label in the third state, as here. Exactly what prompted the Colton firm to tread so carefully in the  second issue is unclear. Perhaps things were changing so rapidly that the outcome was still unclear. In any case, the amendment was clearly considered of sufficient importance to warrant a third edition with its formal label of KANSAS.  Furthermore, Colton also published another hugely influential map in 1854, which focused explicitly and exclusively on the new Territories of Nebraska and Kansas. This map was then, as today, considered the most detailed and reliable depiction of these territories from the year they were created.  Kansas would only achieve statehood in 1861.  

Being among the most important American mapmakers of his time, Colton possessed abundant information and older maps and plates to draw upon when compiling the densely inhabited eastern part of America. But as  with so many maps from this period, the story of this map is really found in the West. The inclusion of Kansas is just one of many interesting and age-specific  features that characterize this map and make it one of the most poignant visualizations of the United States in the middle of the 19th century.

Although still part of a larger ‘Indian Territory’ that stretched into Kansas as well, the shape of what would one day become Oklahoma is clearly identifiable on Colton’s map. Its characteristic panhandle has nevertheless been distinctly colored and separately classified. During the early 1850s, this strip of land underwent a number of statutory and affiliative changes. Thus, in the first edition of this map, Colton included the panhandle as part of Texas, but from the second edition onward these public lands have been re-classified as ‘unorganized territories’. The subsuming of these lands first to the ‘Indian Territories’ of Oklahoma in 1890 and later to the new state of Oklahoma  (established in 1907), was still very much in the making when this seminal map  was published.  

Oklahoma is just one obvious case in which the United States does not yet quite look like itself. In fact, a closer inspection reveals that there is still some  way to go for many of the western states to resemble their present-day forms.  Utah Territory remains one enormous entity with no trace of Nevada in sight.  Nevada, of course, would be rushed into statehood in 1864 (30 years before Utah!), in order to ensure that it would support Lincoln in the General Election  that same year. Nebraska is another clear example of the historicity of this map. It extends from the new border with Kansas in the south, to the Rocky Mountains in the west and the Canadian border in the north, effectively en compassing the modern states of North and South Dakota, Wyoming, Montana, and of course Nebraska itself. As if to underline the persisting frontier character of this territory, Colton continues to use the somewhat antiquated  label ‘Northwest Territory’ to designate this region. 

Washington and Oregon Territories are also clearly delineated and extend all the way to the Rockies, encompassing what in 1890 would become the state of Idaho. In the southwest of the country we find similar scenarios, in which borders are gradually developing into the national entity we know today. The newly acquired Territory of New Mexico extends across an equally massive stretch from Texas in the east to California in the west.  

Looking at the western part of America, one is struck by the massive ridge line of the Rocky Mountains, which cuts through the landscape. The mountains themselves have been rendered in exceptional detail for the time, and clearly show that Colton had had the opportunity to draw on the reports of John  Charles Frémont, also known as ‘The Pathfinder’. Frémont was an American  officer and explorer, and the first Republican presidential candidate. Between 1842 and 1846 he led several expeditions to explore the Rockies, producing  extraordinary maps as a result. Aside from a decisive cartographic achievement, Frémont’s work epitomized the spirit of an age, in which intrepid explorers mapped wild lands under the aegis of the expanding American nation.  The level of detail is echoed in other western ranges, such as the Sierra Neva das, also explored by Frémont.  

When studying this fascinating map, anyone familiar with the southwest border will immediately notice a glaring incongruity with the present-day configuration. We have already mentioned the importance of the year 1854 in the  formation of territorial boundaries within the United States. One of the most  decisive steps in that regard has nevertheless been omitted from Colton’s  chart. The Treaty of Mesilla, more popularly known as the Gadsden Purchase, saw a significant stretch of the U.S.-Mexican border redrawn following the  acquisition of some thirty million acres of land from Mexico in 1854. However,  the treaty was not signed until June of that year, and even in Colton’s third edition of this map, he refrains from incorporating this sensitive political issue and depicts the border with Mexico as it had been since the Mexican-Ameri can War (1846-48); it was not until the 1856 issue of this maps that the Gads den Purchase was recognized and included.  

The Gadsden Purchase sprang from border disputes following the Treaty of  Guadalupe Hidalgo, which brought a formal end to the Mexican-American  War on February 2nd, 1848. While the treaty was quite specific in terms of where the border was to be drawn, the job of securing that border from Indi an attacks fell to the Americans. The Mexican government soon claimed that the U.S. was failing in this regard and demanded large sums in compensation for their losses. In 1853, the newly appointed U.S. president, Franklin Pierce,  appointed James Gadsden as the ambassador to Mexico. The appointment  came with a specific brief: purchase as much land in northern Mexico as possible. Initially, the idea was to acquire large swathes including all of Baja California, Chihuahua, Sonora and beyond. The Mexican government was not interested in selling further territories to the United States, but at the same time wanted to avoid war at all costs. Moreover, Mexican president Santa Anna desperately needed funds for his government and so a deal was brokered.  

Once the Americans realized that they were not going to get all the desired  territories in a negotiated purchase, efforts were concentrated on the wide  strip of land immediately south of the Gila River. American surveyors had  identified the broad Mesilla Valley as the ideal corridor for their new railroad.  In December 1853, an agreement was reached in which the United States  bought 30,000 square miles from Mexico for 10 million dollars (roughly equivalent to 3.5 billion today). The southern border of the United States was for ever re-drawn, and our map is one of the last monumental Colton maps to  depict the older state of affairs.  

A final note should be made on the decorative elements of this map. In addition to a visually powerful color scheme that subdivides the entire country into states and territories, the map is covered with an array of small symbolic or  evocative vignettes. These include vivid renditions of American wildlife: deer in Kansas; a bear in the Northwest Territory; beavers north of the Great Lakes;  a moose, wolves, and arctic foxes at play in Canada; and exotic birds in the Caribbean. Other well-known motifs include traditional images of frontier life:  trapping, hunting, canoeing; scenes of Native Americans engaged in ritual dance; and a wagon trail scene in central Oregon. The maritime space is also full of enticing and extremely well executed images. Many of these are different kinds of ships, but they also include identifiable phenomena such as vol canos and specific coastal views, as well as characteristic Central American crops such as sugar cane and palm trees.  

At the bottom of the map we find two insets. In the lower left corner, the publisher has included a rather detailed little map of the Central American isth mus, endowed with its own nation-based color-scheme, border graticules, a title, and two pictorial vignettes, one of which depicts an early archaeological discovery. The region has of course been featured because of its importance on the route to California, in which passengers sailed down from the Atlantic, made the overland trek across the isthmus, and then continued on again by sea up the west coast.  

In the lower right side of the map, squeezed in between the general map’s table of Statistics of the United States and Table of Distances, we find a similar inset of the West Indies archipelago. This too is quite detailed and has its own title, scale bare, graticules, and landscape vignette. While seemingly reasonable additions to this type of map, both insets are in fact reflections of the rising geo-political interests entertained by America at the time. Such outward aspirations would of course soon be thwarted by internal strife (i.e. the up coming Civil War), but by the end of the century, the United States would  make her heavy presence felt in both of the inserted regions.  

Rarity

The map is scarce, especially dissected and especially in the this third state.