Sign In

- Or use -
Forgot Password Create Account
This item has been sold, but you can enter your email address to be notified if another example becomes available.

Competing Visions of the Solar System

Finely-colored example of Zurner's illustration of Brahe's and Copernicus' models of the solar system.

The two circular diagrams both illustrate heliocentric hypotheses. However, Brahe's shows the planets orbiting the sun, with the sun and moon then orbiting the Earth. Copernicus' model is more familiar, yet it still has the orbits in a circular, rather than an elliptical, shape. 

Separating the two models are illustrations of a solar and lunar eclipse.

Modelling the solar system to 1700

Humans have watched the stars for hundreds of thousands of years and they have postulated many models for the make-up of the heavens and, in particular, of the solar system. Cave paintings reveal knowledge of the equinoxes and solstices dating to more than 30,000 years ago. Ancient Babylonians thought the world revolved around the Earth and used their lunar observations to plot a calendar with twelve months.

The Greeks were especially interested in discerning the order and shape of the cosmos. Parmenides claimed that the solar system was spherical. Anaxagoras made the observation that the moon is likely closer to Earth than the sun. Pythagoras and his followers thought that the moon and other planets likely orbited the Earth, with the Earth itself orbiting a larger fire at the center of the universe.

Other astronomers, like Aristotle, also assumed that the solar system was Earth-centric, with the planets and sun tracing orbits around humanity’s home. Plato thought the Earth was the center, with stars in an outer ring radiating from the Earth. Within the star shell were the orbits of the planets, moon, and sun.

Ptolemy agreed that the system must be geocentric and theorized epicycles, or orbits within larger orbits, to explain planetary motion as seen from Earth. To him, Earth was surrounded by the moon, Mercury, Venus, the sun, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn in concentric circles.

However, inconsistencies and questions remained with Ptolemy’s model. Medieval Islamic astronomers continued to embrace a geocentric theory but combined more precise observations with corrections to try to explain away the issues with a geocentric solar system, including that the motion of the planets did not trace a steady, perfectly circular orbit around the Earth.

In the sixteenth century, Nicolas Copernicus (b. 1473) re-examined the issue of orbits. He thought the planets did orbit in perfectly uniform circles, despite the observation of complex retrograde motion that had flummoxed astronomers for centuries. His massive intervention, however, was to place the sun at the center of the system, not the Earth.

The heliocentric model better explained the varying brightness of the planets, but it also met with resistance from those who had trouble believing that God had not placed humans at the center of the known universe. The controversial nature of the work made Copernicus delay publishing for thirty years; his book, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium, only appeared in 1543, the same year he died.  

Tycho Brahe (b. 1546) collected firsthand observations for years, leading him to believe in the changeability of the stars, rather than their fixity as had previously been accepted. Brahe came up with a new model wherein the planets orbited the sun, but the moon and sun orbited the Earth. This allowed for the orbits of planets to cross with that of the sun, which resolved the problem of stellar parallax.

Johannes Kepler (b. 1571) was an advocate of the heliocentric hypothesis, but he used his teacher, Brahe’s, observations to posit a slightly different configuration than Copernicus or Brahe. Rather than place the sun at exactly the center of the solar system, Kepler thought it was actually off to one side, at one of the two foci of an elliptic orbit. He posited that the planets orbit the sun in elliptical (not circular) orbits, that the radius vector joining the planet and the Sun has an equal area in equal periods, and that the square of the period of the planet (one revolution around the sun) is proportional to the cube of the average distance from the sun. This eliminated the need for epicycles—Ptolemy’s circles within circles—and better accounted for the observed movement of the planets.

These laws of planetary motion were confirmed by Galileo Galilei (b. 1564) when he performed observations with a telescope. Galileo also observed the largest of Jupiter’s moons, Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto.

Finally, Isaac Newton (b. 1642) was able to postulate why the planets orbited the sun. With his law of universal gravitation, Newton explained that any two masses have an attractive force between then proportional to the inverse of the distance squared. This formula allowed for the calculation of the force exerted on each planet by the sun, which pulled the planets into elliptical orbit.

Adam Friedrich Zurner Biography

Adam Friedrich Zürner (15 August 1679 – 18 December 1742) was a German Protestant priest, cartographer and the head of construction of the Kursächsische Postmeilensäulen in Saxony.

Zurner's first project of note was a map of Saxony, for which he was retained by August III, King of Poland, in 1711.  

Zurner was appointed Geographer of Poland and the Electorate of Saxony, a position in which he served until 1732.  In this time period, he reportedly traveled nearly 18,000 miles and created over 900 maps.

In 1721, he was tasked with establishing a postal road system in Saxony and marking the distances with stone posts.  

His work resulted in the Atlas Augusteus Sauronicus (40 maps plus key sheet), which remained incomplete until after Zurner's death, but was ultimately sold to Pieter Schenk in Amsterdam in about 1745.  Schenk's completed work (49 maps, published in Amsterdam and Leipzig) was issued without reference to Zurner's name, under the title Atlas Saxonicus.

Despite his prolific work product, none of Zurner's original manuscript maps seem to survive.